Fill in order details

  • Submit your instructions
    to writers for free!

Chat with the writer

  • Chat with preferred expert writers
  • Request a preview of your paper
    from them for free

Editing

  • Project edited by the quality evaluation department

Download Your Completed Project

  • Download the completed project from your account or have it sent to your email address

[ANSWERED] Post a summary of your findings on your state based on the questions listed above. Explain the types

Now that you are in the final course in your program, it is time to turn in earnest to preparing for certification and licensure. You will need to take and pass the national PMHNP certification exam. Once certified, you will then be eligible to apply for licensure as an advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) in the state desired. It will be up to you to ensure you are knowledgeable about the practice agreements, scope of practice, and prescriptive authority in your state.

Although a movement called the APRN Consensus Model is attempting to standardize NP regulations nationally, it is still the case that requirements vary state to state. In some states, NPs may establish an independent practice without the supervision of an MD. Additionally, states are currently categorized as either allowing full practice, reduced practice, or restricted practice. Full practice states allow NPs to evaluate, order diagnostics, diagnose, and treat patients. They are licensed under the exclusive authority of the state board of nursing for the appropriate state. Many states may require prescriptive authority protocols in addition to collaborative agreement.

Another important area to consider and plan for is prescriptive authority. The appropriate board, which may be the medical board, state board of pharmacy, or nursing board, grants prescriptive authority under state law for the appropriate state licensure. The federal government grants the authority to write for a controlled substance, and the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) verifies this action through by the appropriate state board. Drug Enforcement Agency registration is granted at the federal level and has additional requirements/fees for the registration process.

In this Discussion, you will locate and review the practice agreements in the state in which you plan to practice, identify potential collaboration requirements in your state, and understand the certification and licensing process that you will need to follow.

To Prepare:

  • Review practice agreements in your state.
  • Identify whether your state requires physician collaboration or supervision for nurse practitioners, and if so, what those requirements are.
  • Research the following:
    • How do you get certified and licensed as an Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) in your state?
    • What is the application process for certification in your state?
    • What is your state’s board of nursing website?
    • How does your state define the scope of practice of a nurse practitioner?
    • What is included in your state practice agreement?
    • How do you get a DEA license?
    • Does your state have a prescription monitoring program (PMP)?
    • How does your state describe a nurse practitioner’s controlled-substance prescriptive authority, and what nurse practitioner drug schedules are nurse practitioners authorized to prescribe?

By Day 3 of Week 1

Post a summary of your findings on your state based on the questions listed above. Explain the types of regulations that exist and the barriers that may impact nurse practitioner independent practice in your state. Be specific. Also, describe what surprised you from your research.

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Name: NRNP_6675_Week1_Discussion_Rubric

  Excellent

90%–100%

Good

80%–89%

Fair

70%–79%

Poor

0%–69%

Main Posting:

Response to the Discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Thoroughly responds to the Discussion question(s)

Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources

No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth

Supported by at least three current credible sources

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to most of the Discussion question(s)

Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module

50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth

Supported by at least three credible references

31 (31%) – 34 (34%)

Responds to some of the Discussion question(s)

One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module

Post is supported by fewer than two credible references

0 (0%) – 30 (30%)

Does not respond to the Discussion question(s)

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module

Contains only one or no credible references

Main Posting:

Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

Written clearly and concisely

Contains no grammatical or spelling errors

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Written concisely

May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style with minor errors

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Written somewhat concisely

May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors

Contains some APA formatting errors

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Not written clearly or concisely

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style

Main Posting:

Timely and full participation

9 (9%) – 10 (10%)

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation

Posts main Discussion by due date

8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

Posts main Discussion by due date

Meets requirements for full participation

7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

Posts main Discussion by due date

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Does not meet requirements for full participation

Does not post main Discussion by due date

First Response:

Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources

9 (9%) – 9 (9%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

Responds to questions posed by faculty

The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

Response is on topic, may have some depth.

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Response may not be on topic, lacks depth.

First Response:

 

Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources

Response is written in standard, edited English.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Response posted in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.

First Response:

 

Timely and full participation

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation

Posts by due date

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Meets requirements for full participation

Posts by due date

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Posts by due date

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Does not meet requirements for full participation

Does not post by due date

Second Response:

 

Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources

9 (9%) – 9 (9%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Responds to questions posed by faculty

The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

Response is on topic, may have some depth.

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Response may not be on topic, lacks depth.

Second Response:

 

Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources

Response is written in standard, edited English.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response:

 

Timely and full participation

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation

Posts by due date

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Meets requirements for full participation

Posts by due date

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Posts by due date

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Does not meet requirements for full participation

Does not post by due date

Total Points: 100

Name: NRNP_6675_Week1_Discussion_Rubric

Expert Answer and Explanation

Certification and Licensure in Georgia

In Georgia, one can be licensed if they pass NCLEX-RN exams as well as the undergraduate nursing degree program. Background check is also required for those who are applying for licensure. To apply for the license, one has to fill application forms, pay $75 fee and submit transcripts as well as evidence of background check. The employment document is then verified before the applicant completes Georgia Board of nursing re-entry program. The website, sos.ga.gov provides resources for anyone who wants to know about application procedures. The scope of practice, as defined by this state, is a nurse can prescribe under the physician’s supervision (Mark & Patel, 2019). For a nurse to practice, they need to sign an agreement that includes the list of physicians they intend to work with. A nurse also requires a license from the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA). To get this license, they need to electronically apply via the Department of Justice web portal. Even with this license, Georgia does not permit nurses to prescribe controlled substance unless they are supervised by a physician (Peterson, 2017). The Georgia’s nurse practitioner organizations are involved in lobbying to remove scope of practice regulations.

Georgia has a number of regulations pertaining to the issuance of license or the SOP. According to section Ga. Rules & Regs. §410-11-.14, a nurse working under a physician can prescribe controlled drugs. For the nurse to practice still based on this regulation, they need to produce a formal protocol. This protocol must show that the nurse is working under a physician. These regulations including issues such as cumbersome licensure procedures can hamper independent practice (NCSL Scope of Practice Policy, 2020). One surprising thing about the research is that a nurse cannot practice independently without producing a written agreement that they would be supervised by a physician (Asiimwe, Muwema, & Drake, 2019).

References

Asiimwe, J. B., Muwema, M., & Drake, K. (2019). Factors that influence transition To Advanced Roles by RN To BSN Nurses, In Three Selected Hospitals Of Central-Uganda. BMC nursing18, 18. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-019-0345-z..

Mark, B. A., & Patel, E. (2019). Nurse Practitioner Scope of Practice: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go?. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 41 (4), 483-487.Doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945918820338.

NCSL Scope of Practice Policy. (2020). State Overview: Georgia. https://scopeofpracticepolicy.org/states/ga/.

Peterson M. E. (2017). Barriers to Practice and the Impact on Health Care: A Nurse Practitioner Focus. Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology8(1), 74–81. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313146728_Barriers_to_Practice_and_the_Impact_on_Health_Care_A_Nurse_Practitioner_Focus.

Place your order now for the similar assignment and get fast, cheap and best quality work written by our expert level  assignment writers.Post a summary of your findings on your state based on the questions listed above. Explain the types

Use Coupon Code: NEW30 to Get 30% OFF Your First Order

ANSWERED! 67-year-old female presents with chief complaint

SOLVED! Healthcare continues to be a lucrative target for

SOLVED! Post a brief explanation of the differences between

SOLVED!! Explain how interprofessional collaboration will

SOLVED! Mr. EBR is a 74-year-old retired Hispanic gentleman

ANSWERED!! Identify your role as a health care professional in supporting Abby’s or Shanti’s dying rituals

ANSWERED!! Explain how personal and business ethics can be subconsciously overridden in decision-making. Does your selected business exemplify this?

ANSWERED!! What parts of the lawmaking process does a nurse have an opportunity to influence the final bill passage?

[ANSWERED] Pakistani Woman with Delusional Thought Processes

[ANSWERED] Create your own script for building a health history and use the Health History Template for guidance (consider the type of language you would use to help your patient be more comfortable).

[ANSWERED] Assessing the Genitalia and Rectum

[ANSWERED] Explain how you would advocate for the

What our customers say
_____

  • Essay was good; although need to do few amendments and add few things, overall it was good and justify money paid.

     

    FinanceProfessional assignment help services
  • it was good
    it has introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion as well
    it was really helpful

    PsychologyProfessional assignment help services
  • Great service. Always provide quick response and best online support and have very very less plagiarism.

    EconomicsProfessional assignment help services
  • Thanks for giving my assignment on time. I really appreciated the work done. This keeps me submitting new assignments.

    HealthcareProfessional assignment help services
  • Thank you my writer. Good job and I really enjoy you fast response. I definitely will recommend to my friends.

     

    NursingProfessional assignment help services
  • Thanks for giving my assignment on time. I really appreciated the work done. This keeps me submitting new assignments.

    NursingProfessional assignment help services
  • Great service. Always povide quick response and best online support and have very very less plagiarism.

     

    Business LawProfessional assignment help services
  • Good writer that fulfil all the requirements that i have been told to the writer. The writer even called to discuss everything with me to continue my assighnment

     

    FinanceProfessional assignment help services
  • Great work on time delivered for work, good understanding well prepared. References was well written in APA format

    NursingProfessional assignment help services
  • The writer had clear communication and ensured to give me a brief overview of how my assignment was going to be structured including an average of the words used in each section in order to avoid going over the limit. Didn't need to escalate even once because the quality of the work was in line with the Standard quality that I chose.

    AccountingProfessional assignment help services
  • It was okay. Not bad, could do better! But marks were good, feedback was also good, so overall 4/5

     

    ProgrammingProfessional assignment help services
  • The solution was excellent and all the requirements was taken into consideration.

    ChemistryProfessional assignment help services
  • On time and the assisgment is veryy well done. thank you very much. i'm happy and this is not the last time of me getting help

     

    ManagementProfessional assignment help services
  • This is solid work thankyou for all the help with this PowerPoint; I m curious what grade ill get in it

     

    NursingProfessional assignment help services
  • Great Work Completed in under a Hour thank you so much. I got a 100 percent on my assignment.

    NursingProfessional assignment help services
  • I got 87%. Thanks for that. I am quite satisfied as You reviewed and changed when I ask for some changes.

     

    ChemistryProfessional assignment help services
  • I got a Distinction in this course. Highly satisfied with the expert work and effort.

     

    Business LawProfessional assignment help services
  • I am very happy with this assignment. Thank you very much to the expert who has done this for me.

     

    Business LawProfessional assignment help services
  • So far this is the highest marks I got for an assignment done by you guys. I got 42/50 for this assignment. The exact feedback from my lecturer was:
    Introduction: Good introduction to assisted dying, especially in relation to laws within Australia. Introduction was a little too long.
    Aim or Purpose: Good purpose but improved grammar needed. Good use of PICO.
    Method: The method, while explained is very out of order. Try to write a methods section that can be followed in a step by step fashion

    NursingProfessional assignment help services
  • You did a good job just some details were missed enough attention. To be honest, you did much better job than the other websites. I would like to have more experience with you then I can give you more detailed feedback.

     

    ManagementProfessional assignment help services

You cannot copy content of this page