In a 750-1,000 word paper, create a plan of action to incorporate health promotion strategies for this family
Refer back to the interview and evaluation you conducted in the Topic 2 Family Health Assessment assignment. Identify the social determinates of health (SDOH) contributing to the family’s health status. In a 750-1,000 word paper, create a plan of action to incorporate health promotion strategies for this family. Include the following:
- Describe the SDOH that affect the family health status. What is the impact of these SDOH on the family? Discuss why these factors are prevalent for this family.
- Based on the information gathered through the family health assessment, recommend age-appropriate screenings for each family member. Provide support and rationale for your suggestions.
- Choose a health model to assist in creating a plan of action. Describe the model selected. Discuss the reasons why this health model is the best choice for this family. Provide rationale for your reasoning.
- Using the model, outline the steps for a family-centered health promotion. Include strategies for communication.
Cite at least three peer-reviewed or scholarly sources to complete this assignment. Sources should be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Course Resources if you need assistance.
Rubric Criteria
|
Criterion |
1. Unsatisfactory |
2. Less than Satisfactory |
3. Satisfactory |
4. Good |
5. Excellent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) |
0 points Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. |
5.63 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present. |
5.93 points Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. |
6.68 points Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. |
7.5 points Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
|
Age-Appropriate Screening Recommendations Age-Appropriate Screening Recommendations |
0 points Age-appropriate screenings are not presented. |
22.5 points Screenings are presented for some family members. The screenings are not age appropriate. Screenings are not relevant to the information gathered through family health assessment. |
23.7 points Screenings are presented for each family member. Screenings are generally age appropriate, but entirely not relevant based on the information gathered through family health assessment. More rationale and support is required. |
26.7 points Screenings presented for each family member are age appropriate. Screenings are relevant and based on the information gathered through family health assessment. Some minor rationale or support is needed. |
30 points Screenings presented for each family member are age appropriate and highly relevant. Screenings correlate to the information gathered through family health assessment. Strong rationale and support is presented. |
|
Application of Health Model Application of Health Model |
0 points Family-centered health promotion using selected health model is omitted. |
22.5 points Steps for a family-centered health promotion are partially presented. The health promotion is not based on the health model. Significant aspects are missing. There are major inaccuracies. |
23.7 points The health model is used to create a general family-centered health promotion. The steps to achieve the desired outcome require more detail to illustrate a clear plan of action. A general plan for communication with the family is presented. More rationale and support is required. |
26.7 points The health model is used to create a relevant family-centered health promotion. The steps to achieve the desired outcome are illustrated. Strategies for communication with the family are presented. |
30 points The health model is used to create a relevant and viable family-centered health promotion. The steps to achieve the desired outcome are described in detail. Appropriate strategies for communication with the family are clearly presented. The health promotion is well-designed and demonstrates an ability to assimilate findings and appropriately apply theoretical knowledge to achieve desired outcomes. |
|
Thesis Development and Purpose Thesis Development and Purpose |
0 points Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. |
5.63 points Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. |
5.93 points Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. |
6.68 points Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. |
7.5 points Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
|
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) |
0 points Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. |
2.25 points Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. |
2.37 points Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. |
2.67 points Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. |
3 points All format elements are correct. |
|
Argument Logic and Construction Argument Logic and Construction |
0 points Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. |
5.63 points Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. |
5.93 points Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. |
6.68 points Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. |
7.5 points Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
|
Documentation of Sources Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) |
0 points Sources are not documented. |
3.38 points Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. |
3.56 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. |
4.01 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. |
4.5 points Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
|
Assessment of Health Model Assessment of Health Model |
0 points A health model to assist in the creation of a plan of action is not presented. The model chosen is not a health model. |
22.5 points A health model is selected to assist in creating a plan of action. The description of the model is incomplete. It is unclear why the chosen model is best for this family. |
23.7 points A health model is selected and described. A summary of how the model will assist in creating a plan of action is presented. A general overview for why it is best for this family is provided. More rationale and support is required. |
26.7 points A health model is selected and described. A discussion of how the model will assist in creating a plan of action is presented. Reasons for why it is best for this family are provided. Some rationale or support is needed. |
30 points A health model is selected and thoroughly described. A detailed discussion of how the model will assist in creating a plan of action is presented. Reasons for why it is best for this family are clearly outlined. Strong rationale and support are provided to support reasoning. |
|
SDOH Affecting Family and Family Health Status SDOH Affecting Family and Family Health Status |
0 points SDOH affecting family health status, and the direct impact to the family, are not presented. |
22.5 points SDOH affecting family health status are partially presented. SDOH listed are not relevant to the family. The direct impact to the family, and why the factors are prevalent to the family, are unclear. There are inaccuracies. |
23.7 points Key SDOH affecting family health status are summarized. The SDOH identified are relevant to the family. The direct impact to the family, and why the factors are prevalent to the family, are generally discussed. More support or rationale is needed in some areas. |
26.7 points The overall SDOH affecting family health status are accurately identified and described. The SDOH identified are relevant to the family. The direct impact to the family, and why the factors are prevalent to the family, are discussed. |
30 points The SDOH directly affecting family health status are relevant, accurately identified and thoroughly described. The direct impact to the family, and why the factors are prevalent to the family, are discussed in detail. The discussion is well supported and illustrates insight into SDOH and their effect on family health status. |
Expert Answer and Explanation
A wide spectrum of social factors affect the health of individuals and families, and these factors are generally known as the social determinants of health. These factors include and are not limited to one’s level of education, their income, and the environment in which they live. When assessing the health needs of families, providers should consider these social elements, and their impact on the family.
The goal of such an assessment is to help providers to comprehensively understand the health needs of the family, and administer an intervention that meets the family’s health needs. It is imperative to assess how certain social factors affect the health of a selected family, propose age-appropriate screening, and develop the steps for health promotion.
The Social Determinants of Health
The family is doing well economically considering that the parents have well-paying jobs. However, this does not make the family immune to other social factors which can impact the health of families. Culture, and the beliefs which the family attaches to health, for example, seem to affect the family’s health status. The family holds values and beliefs which are rooted in the Christian doctrine of respect for life (Islam, 2019). Therefore, they maintain a hard stance against abortion. Another social issue is the access to the resources about health.
Effect of the Social Determinants of Health on the Family
The selected social factors seem to influence the family health in a variety of ways. The family beliefs, for example, can cause the family to refuse treatment that requires the termination of the pregnancy. These beliefs may cause problems if abortion is required to save the life of a member of the family such as the mother or the eldest daughter. The lack of access to the resources, still, can result to a situation in which the family does not get information on diseases such as diabetes and obesity.
Because of the lack of information on health management, the family may face the risk of obesity or other adverse health events (Khatiban, Tohidi, & Shahdoust, 2019). This social factor may have a serious impact on the health of the elderly in the family considering that she is vulnerable to health issues.
Why the Factors are Prevalent for the Family
There are key reasons why the social factors that affect health are prevalent in the family. First, each family has values and norms, and these are affected by their religious doctrines. Thus, the existence of these doctrines is what seems to cause the prevalence of the beliefs about health in the family. The issue of lack of resources is prevalent because of the lack of investment in such facilities in the community where the family lives (Richards et al., 2018). This can be attributed to the poor governance or the lack of the allocation of the adequate finances to fund the projects such as libraries.
Age-Appropriate Screening for Each Family Member
The needs of the family members may differ because of the age difference among members, and it is important to use the age-appropriate screening to evaluate the health needs of each member. The assessment for the 9-year old will entail examining the height, weight, and senses, and it is performed from the toe to the head. It will also involve examining whether the child can speak coherently.
The same assessment is used for the 12-year old. The assessment of the parents will involve gathering details about blood sugar, stress, and blood pressure. It will also involve prostrate screening and mammogram tests. The 66-year old will be screened cardiac issues and hypertension (Dorell et al., 2017).
Health Model for Creating the Plan
The action plan is based on the family health model (FHM). The goal of the action plan is to optimize the health of person in the family, and reduce the health risks for the family members. To achieve this goal, various measures will be undertaken. Such measures include educating the family about good health behaviors, and managing their health needs. The brochures and handheld devices will be used as the resources for educating the family. The reason for selecting the FHM is because the model provides a step-by-step process for addressing health concerns in the family.
Steps for the Family-Centered Health promotion and Communication Strategies
There are key steps which are involved in health promotion, and by following these steps, a provider can promote the health of the family. The first step entails letting the family to communicate their problems, and recognizing the role each person plays in terms of improving the wellbeing of the entire family unit. The second step entails involving the members in making decisions focused on improving the health of the family, before finalizing the process with the promotion of the cultural literacy (Zhang, 2018). When communicating with the family, strategies such as the use of brochures can help convey the message.
Conclusion
In summary, health assessment goes beyond looking for the physiological or psychological health needs. The assessment can help one gather the pertinent information about the family’s surroundings and other social factors which may affect the health of the family. After exploring the family health needs, providers may use the model such as the FHM to guide the intervention decisions.
References
Dorell, Å., Isaksson, U., Östlund, U., & Sundin, K. (2017). Family Health Conversations have Positive Outcomes on Families – A Mixed Method Research Study. The open nursing journal, 11, 14–25. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2174/1874434601711010014.
Islam, M. M. (2019). Social Determinants of Health and Related Inequalities: Confusion and Implications. Frontiers in public health, 7, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00011.
Khatiban, M., Tohidi, S., & Shahdoust, M. (2019). The effects of applying an assessment form based on the health functional patterns on nursing student’s attitude and skills in developing the nursing process. International journal of nursing sciences, 6(3), 329–333. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2019.06.004.
Richards, D. A., Hilli, A., Pentecost, C., Goodwin, V. A., & Frost, J. (2018). Fundamental nursing care: A systematic review of the evidence on the effect of nursing care interventions for nutrition, elimination, mobility and hygiene. Journal of clinical nursing, 27(11-12), 2179–2188. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14150.
Zhang, Y. (2018). Family functioning in the context of an adult family member with illness: A concept analysis. Journal of clinical nursing, 27(15-16), 3205–3224.Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14500.
Use Coupon Code: NEW30 to Get 30% OFF Your First Order
Other Answered Questions:
ANSWERED! 67-year-old female presents with chief complaint
SOLVED! Healthcare continues to be a lucrative target for