Fill in order details

  • Submit your instructions
    to writers for free!

Chat with the writer

  • Chat with preferred expert writers
  • Request a preview of your paper
    from them for free

Editing

  • Project edited by the quality evaluation department

Download Your Completed Project

  • Download the completed project from your account or have it sent to your email address

Explain the biological (genetic and neuroscientific); psychological (behavioral and cognitive processes, emotional, developmental); and social, cultural, and interpersonal factors that influence the development of psychopathology

Discussion: Factors That Influence the Development of Psychopathology

Photo Credit: Getty Images/Blend Images

In many realms of medicine, objective diagnoses can be made: A clavicula is broken.  An infection is present. TSH levels meet the diagnostic criteria for hypothyroidism. Psychiatry, on the other hand, deals with psychological phenomena and behaviors. Can these, too, be “defined objectively and by scientific criteria (Gergen, 1985), or are they social constructions?” (Sadock et al., 2015).

Thanks to myriad advances during recent decades, we know that psychopathology is caused by many interacting factors. Theoretical and clinical contributions to the field have come from the neural sciences, genetics, psychology, and social-cultural sciences. How do these factors impact the expression, classification, diagnosis, and prevalence of psychopathology, and why might it be important for a nurse practitioner to take a multidimensional, integrative approach?

To Prepare:

  • Review this week’s Learning Resources, considering the many interacting factors that contribute to the development of psychopathology.
  • Consider how theoretical perspective on psychopathology impacts the work of the PMHNP.

 

Explain the biological (genetic and neuroscientific); psychological (behavioral and cognitive processes, emotional, developmental); and social, cultural, and interpersonal factors that influence the development of psychopathology.

 

Rubric Detail

 

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Name: NRNP_6635_Week1_Discussion_Rubric

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting:

Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s).

Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

Supported by at least 3 current credible sources.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to most of the discussion question(s).

Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth.

Supported by at least 3 credible references.

31 (31%) – 34 (34%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references.

0 (0%) – 30 (30%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s).

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Contains only 1 or no credible references.

Main Posting:

Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

Written clearly and concisely.

Contains no grammatical or spelling errors.

Further adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Written concisely.

May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors.

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Written somewhat concisely.

May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Not written clearly or concisely.

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Posting:

Timely and full participation

9 (9%) – 10 (10%)

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts main discussion by due date.

8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

Posts main discussion by due date.

Meets requirements for full participation.

7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

Posts main discussion by due date.

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post main discussion by due date.

First Response:

Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

9 (9%) – 9 (9%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Responds to questions posed by faculty.

The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

Response is on topic, may have some depth.

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Response may not be on topic, lacks depth.

First Response:

Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in Standard, Edited English.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources.

Response is written in Standard, Edited English.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Response posed in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective communication.

Response to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.

First Response:

Timely and full participation

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts by due date.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Meets requirements for full participation.

Posts by due date.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Posts by due date.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post by due date.

Second Response:

Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

9 (9%) – 9 (9%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Responds to questions posed by faculty.

The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

Response is on topic, may have some depth.

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Response may not be on topic, lacks depth.

Second Response:

Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in Standard, Edited English.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources.

Response is written in Standard, Edited English.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Response posed in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective communication.

Response to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response:

Timely and full participation

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts by due date.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Meets requirements for full participation.

Posts by due date.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Posts by due date.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post by due date.

Total Points: 100

Name: NRNP_6635_Week1_Discussion_Rubric

Place your order now for the similar assignment and get fast, cheap and best quality work written by our expert level  assignment writers.Explain the biological (genetic and neuroscientific); psychological (behavioral and cognitive processes, emotional, developmental); and social, cultural, and interpersonal factors that influence the development of psychopathology

Use Coupon Code: NEW30 to Get 30% OFF Your First Order

Answered Questions:

ANSWERED!! What parts of the lawmaking process does a nurse have an opportunity to influence the final bill passage?

ANSWERED!! Case Study: Sherman Tremaine

[ANSWERED] Create your own script for building a health history and use the Health History Template for guidance (consider the type of language you would use to help your patient be more comfortable).

[ANSWERED] Pakistani Woman with Delusional Thought Processes

[ANSWERED] Discuss a formal role where a nurse is in

[ANSWERED] A 32-year-old female presents to the ED with

ANSWERED!! What is your definition of spiritual care?

What our customers say
_____

  • Essay was good; although need to do few amendments and add few things, overall it was good and justify money paid.

     

    FinanceProfessional assignment help services
  • it was good
    it has introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion as well
    it was really helpful

    PsychologyProfessional assignment help services
  • Great service. Always provide quick response and best online support and have very very less plagiarism.

    EconomicsProfessional assignment help services
  • Thanks for giving my assignment on time. I really appreciated the work done. This keeps me submitting new assignments.

    HealthcareProfessional assignment help services
  • Thank you my writer. Good job and I really enjoy you fast response. I definitely will recommend to my friends.

     

    NursingProfessional assignment help services
  • Thanks for giving my assignment on time. I really appreciated the work done. This keeps me submitting new assignments.

    NursingProfessional assignment help services
  • Great service. Always povide quick response and best online support and have very very less plagiarism.

     

    Business LawProfessional assignment help services
  • Good writer that fulfil all the requirements that i have been told to the writer. The writer even called to discuss everything with me to continue my assighnment

     

    FinanceProfessional assignment help services
  • Great work on time delivered for work, good understanding well prepared. References was well written in APA format

    NursingProfessional assignment help services
  • The writer had clear communication and ensured to give me a brief overview of how my assignment was going to be structured including an average of the words used in each section in order to avoid going over the limit. Didn't need to escalate even once because the quality of the work was in line with the Standard quality that I chose.

    AccountingProfessional assignment help services
  • It was okay. Not bad, could do better! But marks were good, feedback was also good, so overall 4/5

     

    ProgrammingProfessional assignment help services
  • The solution was excellent and all the requirements was taken into consideration.

    ChemistryProfessional assignment help services
  • On time and the assisgment is veryy well done. thank you very much. i'm happy and this is not the last time of me getting help

     

    ManagementProfessional assignment help services
  • This is solid work thankyou for all the help with this PowerPoint; I m curious what grade ill get in it

     

    NursingProfessional assignment help services
  • Great Work Completed in under a Hour thank you so much. I got a 100 percent on my assignment.

    NursingProfessional assignment help services
  • I got 87%. Thanks for that. I am quite satisfied as You reviewed and changed when I ask for some changes.

     

    ChemistryProfessional assignment help services
  • I got a Distinction in this course. Highly satisfied with the expert work and effort.

     

    Business LawProfessional assignment help services
  • I am very happy with this assignment. Thank you very much to the expert who has done this for me.

     

    Business LawProfessional assignment help services
  • So far this is the highest marks I got for an assignment done by you guys. I got 42/50 for this assignment. The exact feedback from my lecturer was:
    Introduction: Good introduction to assisted dying, especially in relation to laws within Australia. Introduction was a little too long.
    Aim or Purpose: Good purpose but improved grammar needed. Good use of PICO.
    Method: The method, while explained is very out of order. Try to write a methods section that can be followed in a step by step fashion

    NursingProfessional assignment help services
  • You did a good job just some details were missed enough attention. To be honest, you did much better job than the other websites. I would like to have more experience with you then I can give you more detailed feedback.

     

    ManagementProfessional assignment help services

You cannot copy content of this page