[SOLVED] Briefly summarize the patient case study you were assigned including each of the three decisions you took for the patient presented

Briefly summarize the patient case study you were assigned including each of the three decisions you took for the patient presented

To Prepare

  • Review the interactive media piece assigned by your Instructor.
  • Reflect on the patient’s symptoms and aspects of the disorder presented in the interactive media piece.
  • Consider how you might assess and treat patients presenting with the symptoms of the patient case study you were assigned.
  • You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the diagnosis and treatment for this patient. Reflect on potential co-morbid physical as well as patient factors that might impact the patient’s diagnosis and treatment.

[SOLVED] Briefly summarize the patient case study you were assigned including each of the three decisions you took for the patient presented.

By Day 7 of Week 8

Write a 1- to 2-page summary paper that addresses the following:

  • Briefly summarize the patient case study you were assigned including each of the three decisions you took for the patient presented.
  • Based on the decisions you recommended for the patient case study, explain whether you believe the decisions provided were supported by the evidence-based literature. Be specific and provide examples. Be sure to support your response with evidence and references from outside resources.
  • What were you hoping to achieve with the decisions you recommended for the patient case study you were assigned? Support your response with evidence and references from outside resources.
  • Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decision in the exercise. Describe whether they were different. Be specific and provide examples.

>expert answer

Expert Answer and Explanation

Decision Tree for Neurological and Musculoskeletal Disorders

Decision made

Summary of the Case and Decision Made

The case study assigned was about Mr. Akkad is a 76-year-old Iranian male who brought a nurse’s office by his son because he exhibits strange behavior, which started two years ago. The patient’s family doctor ruled any organic basis for this behavior. Lab results, including CT-scan, show that the patient is healthy.

The patient’s son mentions that the patient has lost interest in things he viewed as significant in his life. The patient is also forgetful. Diagnosis tests presumed that the patient has major neurocognitive disorder due to Alzheimer’s disease. Therefore, it was recommended that he start taking 1.

5mg rivastigmine orally BID and increase the dose to 3mg orally BID in two weeks. When he did show any positive result, the dose was increased to 4.5 mg orally BID for one month. After four weeks, the current dose was maintained because it showed positive results.

Justification of the Decisions Made 

Rivastigmine was prescribed to the patient because it is one of the drugs used to treat the effects of moderate and mild Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s condition. According to Regenold et al. (2018), rivastigmine has been used for the treatment of dementia diseases because it has proved to be effective in improving thinking and memory of people who experience deterioration of mental health.

Also, the drugs have been used because it can increase the patient’s functional activities. The patient has had behavioral problems. Thus, it was used to improve the patient his strange behaviors. Khoury et al. (2018) report that the drug should be prescribed from 1.5 mg, and if the patient does not show positive improvement, it should be increased gradually.

The drug has shown significant symptomatic effects when used by dementia patients (Kadohara et al., 2017). Thus, it was used so that it can improve the independence of the patient.

The Possible Results for the Decisions

When making the decisions for this case, I was hoping to achieve the following results. First, I was hoping that the medication would improve the thinking of the patient, and thus make him embark on the activities he previously deemed important, such as going for religious functions. It was hoped that the drug could improve the reasoning of the patient, and this would make it less amused when he encounteres elements, he deemed serious (Khoury et al.

, 2018). Also, it was hoped the patient’s behavior would change after he takes the prescribed medication.


Comparison Between the Results Expected and the Ones Achieved 

Exelon to 4.5 mg orally BID dose was prescribed because it was hoped that the medication could improve the mental condition of the patient. However, the actual results were different. The patient’s son returned to the hospital, complaining that the medication did not work after four weeks. As a result, the dosage was increased to 3 mg.

The dosage was increased with the hope that the patient’s condition could improve. However, the patient still scored 18 out of 30 with key deficits in the recall, registration, calculation and attention, and orientation. Also, his son complained that his father was still not interested in significant activities, such as religious functions.

Therefore, the dose was increased to 4.5, and it was aimed that this drug would work this time. Weeks later, the patient’s son came back to the hospital complaining that the health of this father I still not better. However, he reports that the patient can now attend religious functions. Thus, I decided that the current medication should be maintained for four more weeks because it has proven to be somehow effective.


Kadohara, K., Sato, I., Doi, Y., Arai, M., Fujii, Y., Matsunaga, T., & Kawakami, K. (2017). Prescription patterns of medications for Alzheimer’s disease in Japan from 2010 to 2015: a descriptive pharmacy claims database study. Neurology and therapy, 6(1), 25-37. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40120-016-0057-1

therapeutic advances

Khoury, R., Rajamanickam, J., & Grossberg, G. T. (2018). An update on the safety of current therapies for Alzheimer’s disease: focus on rivastigmine. Therapeutic advances in drug safety, 9(3), 171-178. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2042098617750555

Regenold, W. T., Loreck, D. J., & Brandt, N. (2018). Prescribing Cholinesterase Inhibitors for Alzheimer Disease: Timing Matters. American family physician, 97(11), 700-700. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Prescribing-Cholinesterase-Inhibitors-for-Alzheimer-Regenold-Loreck/d42dcbd248bf0595610e9963718617ddb3bee3c3

Place your order now for the similar assignment and get fast, cheap and best quality work written by our expert level  assignment writers.Briefly summarize the patient case study you were assigned including each of the three decisions you took for the patient presented

Use Coupon Code: NEW30 to Get 30% OFF Your First Order

ANSWERED! 67-year-old female presents with chief complaint


SOLVED! Healthcare continues to be a lucrative target for

SOLVED! Post a brief explanation of the differences between

SOLVED!! Explain how interprofessional collaboration will

SOLVED! Mr. EBR is a 74-year-old retired Hispanic gentleman


ANSWERED!! Identify your role as a health care professional in supporting Abby’s or Shanti’s dying rituals

ANSWERED!! Explain how personal and business ethics can be subconsciously overridden in decision-making. Does your selected business exemplify this?

ANSWERED!! What parts of the lawmaking process does a nurse have an opportunity to influence the final bill passage?

[ANSWERED] Pakistani Woman with Delusional Thought Processes

Health history template

[ANSWERED] Create your own script for building a health history and use the Health History Template for guidance (consider the type of language you would use to help your patient be more comfortable).

[ANSWERED] Assessing the Genitalia and Rectum

[ANSWERED] Explain how you would advocate for the

What our customers say

Essay was good; although need to do few amendments and add few things, overall it was good and justify money paid.


it was good
it has introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion as well
it was really helpful

Great service. Always provide quick response and best online support and have very very less plagiarism.

Thanks for giving my assignment on time. I really appreciated the work done. This keeps me submitting new assignments.

Thank you my writer. Good job and I really enjoy you fast response. I definitely will recommend to my friends.


Thanks for giving my assignment on time. I really appreciated the work done. This keeps me submitting new assignments.

Great service. Always povide quick response and best online support and have very very less plagiarism.


Good writer that fulfil all the requirements that i have been told to the writer. The writer even called to discuss everything with me to continue my assighnment


Great work on time delivered for work, good understanding well prepared. References was well written in APA format

The writer had clear communication and ensured to give me a brief overview of how my assignment was going to be structured including an average of the words used in each section in order to avoid going over the limit. Didn't need to escalate even once because the quality of the work was in line with the Standard quality that I chose.

It was okay. Not bad, could do better! But marks were good, feedback was also good, so overall 4/5


The solution was excellent and all the requirements was taken into consideration.

On time and the assisgment is veryy well done. thank you very much. i'm happy and this is not the last time of me getting help


This is solid work thankyou for all the help with this PowerPoint; I m curious what grade ill get in it


Great Work Completed in under a Hour thank you so much. I got a 100 percent on my assignment.

I got 87%. Thanks for that. I am quite satisfied as You reviewed and changed when I ask for some changes.


I got a Distinction in this course. Highly satisfied with the expert work and effort.


I am very happy with this assignment. Thank you very much to the expert who has done this for me.


So far this is the highest marks I got for an assignment done by you guys. I got 42/50 for this assignment. The exact feedback from my lecturer was:
Introduction: Good introduction to assisted dying, especially in relation to laws within Australia. Introduction was a little too long.
Aim or Purpose: Good purpose but improved grammar needed. Good use of PICO.
Method: The method, while explained is very out of order. Try to write a methods section that can be followed in a step by step fashion

You did a good job just some details were missed enough attention. To be honest, you did much better job than the other websites. I would like to have more experience with you then I can give you more detailed feedback.