Fill in order details

  • Submit your instructions
    to writers for free!

Chat with the writer

  • Chat with preferred expert writers
  • Request a preview of your paper
    from them for free

Editing

  • Project edited by the quality evaluation department

Download Your Completed Project

  • Download the completed project from your account or have it sent to your email address

ANSWERED!! Post an explanation of at least two opportunities that currently exist for RNs and APRNs to actively participate in policy review.

Post an explanation of at least two opportunities that currently exist for RNs and APRNs to actively participate in policy review.

The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy Evaluation

Some nurses may be hesitant to get involved with policy evaluation. The preference may be to focus on the care and well-being of their patients; some nurses may feel ill-equipped to enter the realm of policy and political activities. However, as you have examined previously, who better to advocate for patients and effective programs and polices than nurses? Already patient advocates in interactions with doctors and leadership, why not with government and regulatory agencies?

Post an explanation of at least two opportunities that currently exist for RNs and APRNs to actively participate in policy review. Explain some of the challenges that these opportunities may present and describe how you might overcome these challenges. Finally, recommend two strategies you might make to better advocate for or communicate the existence of these opportunities. Be specific and provide examples.

ANSWER

The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy Evaluation

Opportunities that Exist

Very often, some nurses to hesitate in policy evaluation roles, where they claim that their main attention should be focusing on the well-being of patients. However, it should be understood that taking care of patients starts from the point of making and implementing policies, and not only at the direct care operations (Shiramizu et al., 2017). Nurses are more equipped than any other healthcare provider to become the advocates of patients and their health programs. RNs and APRNs have numerous opportunities for them to participate in policy reviews, and this allows proper participation in healthcare decisions.

The American Nurses Association (ANA) articulates for the principles of justice, respect for persons, beneficence, and many other code of ethics that show that nurses should be at the upper hand in advocating for policy change. According to Williams & Anderson (2018), pending revisions about the common rules of healthcare involve topics such as beneficence, respect for persons, use of human research subjects, omic technologies and many others. Nurses are specially trained to use evidence in developing amicable decisions of healthcare (Williams & Anderson, 2018). Unlike most other healthcare givers, they can use evidence-based practice to improve omic research, to understand right concepts about decision making, privacy, equality, data security, and many more (Williams & Anderson, 2018).

Challenges Presented by these Opportunities

The main challenge in implementing these opportunities is the opposition from other players in healthcare. Nurses also have the capacity to address clinical gaps and focus on agency funding’s, making them crucial personalities in research centers quality assurance (Glasgow et al., 2003). They also serve as a crucial bridge to the gap between practice and research, advocating for proper methodologies and documentation (Shiramizu et al., 2017). Hence, it is crucial that nurses, and not all other participants in healthcare, be involved in policy evaluation.

Overcoming the Challenges

It is necessary to perform routine education to physicians, clinicians, doctors, and other healthcare givers in order to make them understand and appreciate the contribution of nurses to healthcare policies. Reviewing the actions associated with policy making could also help solve these challenges.

References

Glasgow, R. E., Lichtenstein, E., & Marcus, A. C. (2003). Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. American journal of public health93(8), 1261-1267.

Shiramizu, B., Shambaugh, V., Petrovich, H., Seto, T. B., Ho, T., Mokuau, N., & Hedges, J. R. (2017). Leading by success: Impact of a clinical and translational research infrastructure program to address health inequities. Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities4(5), 983-991.

Williams, J. K., & Anderson, C. M. (2018). Omics research ethics considerations. Nursing outlook66(4), 386-393.

DISCLAIMER: THIS ANSWER HAS ALREADY BEEN SUBMITTTED. 

Place your order now for the similar assignment and get fast, cheap and best quality work written by our expert level  assignment writers.Post an explanation of at least two opportunities that currently exist for RNs and APRNs to actively participate in policy review

Use Coupon Code: NEW30 to Get 30% OFF Your First Order

What our customers say
_____

You cannot copy content of this page