Fill in order details

  • Submit your instructions
    to writers for free!

Chat with the writer

  • Chat with preferred expert writers
  • Request a preview of your paper
    from them for free


  • Project edited by the quality evaluation department

Download Your Completed Project

  • Download the completed project from your account or have it sent to your email address

[ANSWERED 2022] AB a 21-year-old WF college student reports to your clinic with external bumps on her genital area. She states the bumps are painless and feel rough

AB a 21-year-old WF college student reports to your clinic with external bumps on her genital area. She states the bumps are painless and feel rough



  • CC: “I have bumps on my bottom that I want to have checked out.”
  • HPI: AB a 21-year-old WF college student reports to your clinic with external bumps on her genital area. She states the bumps are painless and feel rough. She states she is sexually active and has had  more than one partner during the past year. Her initial sexual contact occurred at age 18. She reports no abnormal vaginal discharge. She is unsure how long the bumps have been there but noticed them about a week  ago. Her last Pap smear exam was 3 years ago, and no dysplasia was found; the exam results were normal. She  reports one sexually transmitted infection (chlamydia) about 2 years ago.  She completed the treatment for chlamydia as prescribed.
  • PMH: Asthma
  • Medications: Symbicort 160/4.5mcg
  • Allergies: NKDA
  • FH: No hx of breast or cervical cancer,  Father hx HTN, Mother hx HTN, GERD
  • Social: Denies tobacco use; occasional etoh, married, 3 children (1 girl, 2 boys)


  • VS: Temp 98.6; BP 120/86; RR 16; P 92; HT 5’10”; WT 169lbs
  • Heart: RRR, no murmurs
  • Lungs: CTA, chest wall symmetrical
  • Genital: Normal female hair pattern distribution; no masses  or swelling. Urethral meatus intact without erythema or discharge. Perineum intact. Vaginal mucosa pink and moist with rugae present, pos for firm, round, small, painless ulcer noted on external labia.
  • Abd: soft, normoactive bowel sounds, neg rebound, neg murphy’s, negMcBurney
  • Diagnostics: HSV specimen obtained

Using evidence-based resources from your search, answer the following questions and support your answers using current evidence from the literature.

  • Analyze the subjective portion of the note. List additional information that should be included in the documentation.
  • Analyze the objective portion of the note. List additional information that should be included in the documentation.
  • Is the assessment supported by the subjective and objective information? Why or why not?
  • Would diagnostics be appropriate for this case, and how would the results be used to make a diagnosis?
  • Would you reject/accept the current diagnosis? Why or why not? Identify three possible conditions that may be considered as a differential diagnosis for this patient. Explain your reasoning using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature.

Expert Answer and Explanation

The diagnosis of sexually transmitted diseases includes choosing the type of discharge, blood tests, urine tests, and the examination of other physical symptoms such as pain during sexual intercourse or burning sensations during urination. The similarity of the symptoms of different STIs makes it hard for healthcare givers to easily pinpoint the exact disease that the patient suffers from (Ball et al., 2017). A close assessment of the objective and subjective information of AB, a 21 y.o. pt. with the symptoms of STIs, helps to assess the truthfulness of the diagnosis provided as well as to provide her a preferential diagnosis.

Subjective Data

The patient has painless bumps in her genitalia, and these feel rough time to time. She does not have any abnormal vaginal discharge, and is unsure about the time the vaginal bumps appeared. However, she says she realized she has them about two weeks ago. Besides being sexually active since the age of 18, she says that she has had at least two sexual partners over the past one year. She has NKDA allergy, a past medical history of asthma, and she is also taking some medications including Symbicort. She also got Chlamydia at 19, and a pap smear conducted three years ago confirmed the absence of dysplasia. He has no breast cancer or cervical cancer history, but both parents have hx of HTN and GERD. The last part of the subjective information is that she has three children, abuses alcohol occasionally, but does not smoke. The additional subjective information could be assessing whether or not she is pregnant.

Objective Data

The vitals of the patient are as follows: Temp 98.6; HT 5’10”; BP 120/86; P 92; WT 169lbs, and RR 16. Her hurt does not show visible signs of murmurs, and a CTA of the lungs shows that they are symmetrical. The genital assessment shows the absence of swellings or masses, intact urethral meatus, and normal hair distribution. Also, the vaginal mucosa is pink as expected, but there is rugae. Also, there is a painless ulcer on the external labia of the vagina. The abdominal assessment shows soft bowel sounds that are normative, neg murphies, and neg rebound. For the diagnostics, a HSV specimen is obtained. Much of the objective information was captured, but the assessor should have collected blood and urine samples to assess them.

Support of the Assessment

Following the assessment of the objective and subjective data, the patient is diagnosed to have chancer, which is right considering the individual symptoms in the genital mucosa characteristics. Painless sores also confirm the presence of the condition.

(Asai et al., 2020).

The Appropriateness of the Diagnostics

While the diagnostics could appear perfect for the scenario, I believe they were not as appropriate as they failed to include crucial assessments that would help in clarity of the diagnosis. Specifically, there should have been the obtaining of blood, fluid, and urine samples which could not only help to identify the illness, but would indicate the exact stage (Janssen et al., 2020).

Rejecting the Diagnosis

I would be quick to reject the diagnosis because the screening was not sufficient enough to make a decision. That is, there is need for further examinations of fluids such as saliva, vaginal discharge, urine, and blood to identify whether the patient had chancre or other sexually transmitted infections or several combined disorders (Abdool Karim et al., 2019).

Differential Diagnosis

In the differential diagnosis, I would consider HPV to be one of the candidates of further examination as it is evident the patient was not aware of the rough sores, which could be indicative of an overgrowth of sores (McCabe et al., 2017). Also, after asking the patient whether they felt painful sensations during urinating I would judge whether or not they have gonorrhea, where I would perform further assessments. Other possible conditions could be Genital Herpes or Chlamydia (which often returns years after the first diagnosis) (Bakshi et al., 2018)


The information presented about patient AB is not sufficient enough to make a rational judgment of the sexually transmitted infection they may be having. While it is evident that the present diagnostics with the current subjective and objective data could be indicative of chancre, it is not easy to rule out other conditions at this early examination stage. The healthcare giver should perform further fluid assessments using saliva, urine, blood, and vaginal discharge samples, which could also help in deciding the stage of illness faced by the patient.


Abdool Karim, S. S., Baxter, C., Passmore, J. A. S., McKinnon, L. R., & Williams, B. L. (2019). The Genital Tract and Rectal Microbiomes: Their Role in HIV Susceptibility and Prevention in Women. Journal of the International AIDS Society22(5), e25300.

Asai, S., Kaneko, A., Matsuda, T., Takanashi, N., Doi, M., Atsumi, H., & Miyachi, H. (2020). Sonographic Appearance of Syphilitic Induration Mimicking Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the Lower Lip: A Case Report. Journal of Medical Case Reports14(1), 1-7.

Bakshi, R. K., Gupta, K., Jordan, S. J., Chi, X., Lensing, S. Y., Press, C. G., & Geisler, W. M. (2018). An adaptive Chlamydia trachomatis-specific IFN-γ-producing CD4+ T cell response is associated with protection against Chlamydia reinfection in women. Frontiers in immunology9, 1981.

Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. (2017). Seidel’s Guide to Physical Examination-E-Book: An Interprofessional Approach. Elsevier Health Sciences.

Janssen, K. J., Wolffs, P., Lucchesi, M., Dukers-Muijrers, N. H., & Hoebe, C. J. (2020). Assessment of Rectal Chlamydia Trachomatis Viable Load in Women by Viability-PCR. Sexually Transmitted Infections96(2), 85-88.

McCabe, B. E., Schaefer Solle, N., Peragallo Montano, N., & Mitrani, V. B. (2017). Alcohol misuse, depressive symptoms, and HIV/STI risks of US Hispanic women. Ethnicity & health22(5), 528-540.

Ramoni, S., Genovese, G., Pastena, A., & Cusini, M. (2020). Primary Syphilis of the Neck Mimicking Pyodermatitis. Sexually Transmitted Diseases47(10), e45-e46. Doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001210

Place your order now for the similar assignment and get fast, cheap and best quality work written by our expert level  assignment writers.AB a 21-year-old WF college student reports to your clinic with external bumps on her genital area. She states the bumps are painless and feel rough

Use Coupon Code: NEW30 to Get 30% OFF Your First Order

Other Answered Questions:

ANSWERED!! Case Study: Sherman Tremaine

ANSWERED!! What parts of the lawmaking process does a nurse have an opportunity to influence the final bill passage?

[ANSWERED] Pakistani Woman with Delusional Thought Processes

[ANSWERED] A 32-year-old female presents to the ED with

[ANSWERED] Describe how you will avoid plagiarism

ANSWERED!! Now imagine that you are a university psychology

ANSWERED! In a 4- to 5-page project proposal written to

What our customers say

Essay was good; although need to do few amendments and add few things, overall it was good and justify money paid.


it was good
it has introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion as well
it was really helpful

Great service. Always provide quick response and best online support and have very very less plagiarism.

Thanks for giving my assignment on time. I really appreciated the work done. This keeps me submitting new assignments.

Thank you my writer. Good job and I really enjoy you fast response. I definitely will recommend to my friends.


Thanks for giving my assignment on time. I really appreciated the work done. This keeps me submitting new assignments.

Great service. Always povide quick response and best online support and have very very less plagiarism.


Good writer that fulfil all the requirements that i have been told to the writer. The writer even called to discuss everything with me to continue my assighnment


Great work on time delivered for work, good understanding well prepared. References was well written in APA format

The writer had clear communication and ensured to give me a brief overview of how my assignment was going to be structured including an average of the words used in each section in order to avoid going over the limit. Didn't need to escalate even once because the quality of the work was in line with the Standard quality that I chose.

It was okay. Not bad, could do better! But marks were good, feedback was also good, so overall 4/5


The solution was excellent and all the requirements was taken into consideration.

On time and the assisgment is veryy well done. thank you very much. i'm happy and this is not the last time of me getting help


This is solid work thankyou for all the help with this PowerPoint; I m curious what grade ill get in it


Great Work Completed in under a Hour thank you so much. I got a 100 percent on my assignment.

I got 87%. Thanks for that. I am quite satisfied as You reviewed and changed when I ask for some changes.


I got a Distinction in this course. Highly satisfied with the expert work and effort.


I am very happy with this assignment. Thank you very much to the expert who has done this for me.


So far this is the highest marks I got for an assignment done by you guys. I got 42/50 for this assignment. The exact feedback from my lecturer was:
Introduction: Good introduction to assisted dying, especially in relation to laws within Australia. Introduction was a little too long.
Aim or Purpose: Good purpose but improved grammar needed. Good use of PICO.
Method: The method, while explained is very out of order. Try to write a methods section that can be followed in a step by step fashion

You did a good job just some details were missed enough attention. To be honest, you did much better job than the other websites. I would like to have more experience with you then I can give you more detailed feedback.


You cannot copy content of this page